Annual Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey

2019 Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1162884

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 61 of 105

Since 2016, we have surveyed the corporate governance practices of newly public companies, focusing on the corporate governance provisions and practices found to be problematic under ISS voting policies initiated in 2015 and updated in 2017. The ISS voting policies were seemingly designed to influence the governance practices of companies considering an initial public offering in the United States by recommending a vote against directors of newly public companies due to the adoption of governance policies that diminish shareholder rights. This year, we look back on our surveys of IPO companies since 2015 to consider whether the voting policies have had a significant impact over time. IPO GOVERNANCE PRACTICES Since 2016, we have surveyed the corporate governance practices of newly public companies, focusing on the corporate governance provisions and practices found to be problematic under ISS voting policies initiated in 2015 and updated in 2017. The ISS voting policies were seemingly designed to influence the governance practices of companies considering an initial public offering in the United States by recommending a vote against directors of newly public companies due to the adoption of governance policies that diminish shareholder rights. This year, we look back on our surveys of IPO companies since 2015 to consider whether the voting policies have had a significant impact over time. IPO GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Articles in this issue

view archives of Annual Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey - 2019 Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey