Corporate Governance

2017 Corporate Governance & Execution Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1035491

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 40 of 95

Shearman & Sterling Board Leadership | 39 12 8 Top 100 Companies have a policy stating that these offices SHOULD be separated. Top 100 Companies have a policy stating that these offices SHOULD NOT be separated. 32 BOARD LEADERSHIP SEPARATION OF THE OFFICES OF THE CEO AND CHAIR Separating the offices of the Chief Executive Officer and the chair of the board has been debated for years and is still among the top corporate governance issues facing companies today. Seventy-six Top 100 Companies give the board flexibility to separate or combine the offices of the CEO and chair of the board, depending on which leadership structure is in the company's best interest at the time. Public companies are required to disclose why the board leadership structure they have chosen is appropriate for the company. When the same person serves as both the CEO and board chair, companies generally explain that the approach best serves their constituency because it provides unified leadership, clear accountability and the benefit of deep operational and industry experience. The rationale for splitting the two offices is that the roles have separate and distinct duties — the CEO is responsible for operational leadership and strategic direction of the company, while the board chair facilitates independent oversight of management and leadership of the board. of the Top 100 Companies currently have different individuals serving in the roles of Board Chair and CEO. of the Top 100 Companies (20 of 32) where the positions of CEO and board chair are separated have independent board chairs. board chairs are women. 63% 11 FAST FACTS

Articles in this issue

view archives of Corporate Governance - 2017 Corporate Governance & Execution Compensation Survey