Corporate Governance

2017 Corporate Governance & Execution Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1035491

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 95

Shearman & Sterling IPO Governance | 29 78% 94% 94% 97% 91% 19% 89% 94% 95% 90% 29% 23 92% adopted an exclusive forum provision provided that stockholders cannot remove directors without cause provided that the board can increase the size of the board unilaterally STATE OF INCORPORATION Delaware continues to be the most common state of incorporation among IPO companies. GOVERNANCE PRACTICES ADOPTED BY IPO COMPANIES In both 2015 and 2016, listings were more or less evenly split between NASDAQ and NYSE. Based on the data, most of the companies surveyed in each year adopted practices that ISS identifies as problematic. The data reflect a continued pattern of IPO companies adopting aggressive anti-takeover measures despite the new policy and recent voting actions taken by ISS. In addition, many 2016 companies continued to adopt certain other practices that may face ISS scrutiny in the future: adopted a classified board required a supermajority vote for certain amendments to the certificate of incorporation provided for plurality voting in uncontested director elections did not provide stockholders with the right to call special meetings did not provide stockholders with the right to act by written consent had a multi-class equity structure 2016 2016 % incorporated in Delaware % incorporated in another state % incorporated in Delaware % incorporated in another state 2015 2016 Note: Nearly half remained controlled companies following the IPO. Note: 72% remained controlled companies following the IPO. 95% 5% 94% 6% 84% 92% 98% 84% 91% 97% 2015 2015

Articles in this issue

view archives of Corporate Governance - 2017 Corporate Governance & Execution Compensation Survey