Antitrust

Shearman & Sterling Antitrust Annual Report 2019

Shearman & Sterling LLP

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1146712

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 33 of 147

3 2 OTHER PRE-MERGER RULES APPLY Moreover, even where a transaction is not reportable, or does not require agency clearance, the parties must still comply with other competition rules in the pre- merger phase. This is true in the U.S., where the FTC issued updated guidance in March 2018 regarding information- sharing between merging parties before a transaction closes. The guidance addressed what antitrust authorities refer to as gun-jumping, e.g., pre-closing sharing of competitively sensitive information or coordinated business activities, which can violate the HSR Act as well as substantive antitrust laws. The guidance explains that "[u]nlawful gun jumping may include the exchange of competitively sensitive information, but it typically also involves actual coordination of business activities" prior to HSR clearance. The guidance included a discussion of past enforcement activities that illustrate, among other things, that the FTC will bring antitrust enforcement actions against anti-competitive conduct that is separate from the merger's own competitive effects. For example, the guidance highlighted the FTC charging aluminum tube manufacturers with FTC Act violations because they shared competitively sensitive information during due diligence. The FTC then separately challenged the merger itself as anti- competitive. Ultimately, the FTC required the buyer to divest two mills. MERGER CONTROL 05 G U N - J U M P I N G C A S E S C A N B E B R O U G H T A G A I N S T M E R G I N G PA R T I E S T H A T D O N O T E V E N C O N S U M M A T E T H E I R D E A L Risks for Consummated Deals Even Where No Notification Requirements

Articles in this issue

view archives of Antitrust - Shearman & Sterling Antitrust Annual Report 2019