Annual Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey

2019 Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1162884

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 47 of 105

No-Action Letters reviewed (responded to by the SEC from October 1, 2018 to July 31, 2019) 231 Shearman & Sterling LLP 46 | Shareholder Proposals 2019 – ESG No-Action Letter Trends and Strategies SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS 2019 — ESG NO-ACTION LETTER TRENDS AND STRATEGIES Richard B. Alsop and Yoon-jee Kim INSIGHTS Shareholder proposals relating to ESG matters are frequent targets for exclusion by companies, and based upon a survey of the no- action letters submitted during the 2019 proxy season, this trend continues. Over 40% of the no- action letters we reviewed for the 2019 proxy season related to a variety of ESG matters, and the arguments and outcomes in those letters are instructive as to how companies and the SEC staff are approaching ESG proposals, especially in the wake of recent SEC staff guidance on its approach to requests based on the "economic relevance" (Rule 14a-8(i)(5)) and "ordinary business" (Rule 14a-8(i)(7)) exemptions, which are frequently cited grounds for excluding ESG-related shareholder proposals. 1 In terms of the subject matter of proposals for which exclusion was sought, the largest group related to environmental matters, sustainability and climate change, accounting for 34 out of the 105 ESG-related no-action letters we reviewed. Human rights issues also continued to appear as the subject of numerous proposals 105 ESG-related 1 231 no-action letters responded to by the SEC staff from October 1, 2018 through July 31, 2019 were reviewed. 105 of these letters were categorized as relating to ESG matters, excluding what were categorized as "ordinary" corporate governance proposals relating to matters such as board declassification or the right to call special meetings. ESG-Related No-Action Letter Topics 34 18 4 21 6 3 5 4 10 Environmental Human Rights Political Contributions and Lobbying Animal Cruelty Inequitable Employment Practices Drug Pricing and Executive Compensation Gender Pay Gap ESG-Limiting Proposals Other (including Sexual Harassment, Immigrant Detention, Cybersecurity and Privacy) for which no-action letters were submitted, accounting for 18 no-action letters. Other shareholder proposal topics giving rise to no-action letters included topics such as political contributions and lobbying (ten), animal cruelty (five), drug pricing (four) and proposals relating to inequitable employment practices and the gender pay gap (eight). Other proposal topics that spawned no-action letters included "me too," hate speech, immigrant detainees, diversity and privacy. No-Action Letters reviewed (responded to by the SEC from October 1, 2018 to July 31, 2019) 231

Articles in this issue

view archives of Annual Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey - 2019 Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Survey