Corporate Governance

2022 Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Survey - 20th Annual

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/1484098

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 44 of 99

Shearman & Sterling LLP PBCs and the Pursuit of Corporate Good | 42 Shearman & Sterling LLP THE PBC FORM AS A MANNER OF BRAND MANAGEMENT The brand of a corporation is typically one of its most critical assets. 40 With a growing population of investors, customers, and employees placing greater emphasis on corporate social responsibility, 41 corporations may adopt the PBC form because of the positive impact on its brand promoting a social benefit may have on its ability to remain competitive in the markets in which it competes. 42 For example, in its proxy statement sent to its stockholders to approve the conversion to a PBC, Veeva Systems stated that converting to a PBC would give customers "increased confidence to invest in Veeva's technology," enhance its reputation, and improve long-term financial results. Converting to a PBC helps enshrine the company's values into its certificate of incorporation, which in turn sends signals to investors, customers and employees that the corporation is committed to promoting a public benefit. 43 Now that the 2020 Amendments have made it easier to adopt the PBC form, corporations can more easily consider using the PBC model as a means to shape their corporate brand. Adopting the PBC form could also send a strong signal to customers who prefer to do business with socially conscious corporations 44 by lending credibility to a socially conscious label. 45 In fact, studies have shown that 55% of global online customers would pay more for products and services that are socially responsible. 46 In its proxy statement, Veeva Systems proposed stockholders approve the PBC conversion to "give our customers increased confidence to invest in Veeva's technology solutions, which has the potential to make our revenue base more durable and enhance our ability to invest in innovation for our customers." 47 Gaining a competitive edge in the market was considered a significant benefit to Veeva in converting to the PBC form. Finally, adopting the PBC model could help retain and attract employees who are seeking to contribute to society through their work. 48 Several companies have found it easier to retain talent when the corporation has a strong social purpose. 49 In turn, this can lead to less spending on recruiting and training. TO CONCLUDE Delaware corporate law's general deference to the business judgment of corporate directors grants ample flexibility to pursue corporate actions for the benefit of the corporation, including when the corporation's interests align with that of its customers, employees or community at large. Notwithstanding the common perception that corporations are prohibited from taking any action except to the extent such actions are intended to directly maximize shareholder value, the DGCL actually requires directors to act in the best interests of the corporation, writ large. While the best interests of the corporation may be synonymous with maximizing stockholder value in many cases, particularly in change of control transactions, non-PBC corporations, including several in the Fortune 500, 50 have reminded the public on various occasions, that corporations do and must take into account all their stakeholders, and not just their stockholders, to develop and maintain a thriving and successful business. So while there may be a public benefit, as the PBC Code asserts, to taking corporate action in the interests of non-stockholder stakeholders, the inverse can also be said, which is that corporate actions that serve a social good are in the best interests of one or more corporate stakeholders, and therefore, in the best interests of the corporation itself. 40 See W.C. Bunting, "Against Corporation Activism: Examining the Use of Corporate Speech to Promote Corporate Social Responsibility," SSRN, 74 Okla. L. Rev. at 245, 248 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=3893628 (May 9, 2022). 41 See Simmerman, et al. supra note 9. 42 See Veeva Systems Inc, Proxy Statement for Special Meeting 1-3 (2021); see Simmerman, et al. supra note 9. 43 See Jen Barnette, "FAQ: Delaware Public Benefit Corporations," CooleyGo, https://www.cooleygo.com/faq-delaware-public-benefit-corporations (August 6, 2021). 44 Id., Dorff, supra note 7 at 83. 45 Dorff, supra note 7 at 87, See Christopher Marquis, "Public Benefit Corporations Flourish in the Public Market," Forbes, https://www.forbes. com/sites/christophermarquis/2021/06/14/public-benefit-corporations- flourish-in-the-public-markets/?sh=72246458233d (June 14, 2021). 46 See Dorff, supra note 7 at 87 (citing the U.S. Digital Consumer Report). 47 See Veeva Systems Inc, Proxy Statement for Special Meeting 1-3, at 1 (2021). 48 See Barnette, supra note at 44, Veeva, supra note at 47, Dorff, supra note 7 at 82, 83. 49 See Marquis, supra note 46. 50 Examples include: Apple, Amazon, Walmart, Inc. See "Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote 'An Economy That Serves All Americans'," https://www.businessroundtable.org/ business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote- an-economy-that-serves-all-americans (August 19, 2019).

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Corporate Governance - 2022 Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Survey - 20th Annual