Corporate Governance

2007 Director & Executive Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/440312

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 38 of 41

S H E A R M A N & S T E R L I N G L L P 36 37 S T O C K O W N E R S H I P G U I D E L I N E S P E R F O R M A N C E C O M P E N S A T I O N C L A W B A C K P O L I C I E S Thirty-fi ve of the Top 100 Companies have publicly disclosed that they have a policy recommending or requiring that executives return a portion of their performance-based compensation in the event the company is required to restate its fi nancials. In the aftermath of the Enron and WorldCom scandals and the resulting stricter internal controls and more stringent accounting standards adopted under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, there have been a record number of fi nancial restatements in recent years. These fi nancial restatements raised a concern that if an executive's pay was based on fi nancial achievements that were not actually met, then executives would receive compensation that they had not earned. In order to address this issue, many companies have adopted "clawback policies" that recommend or require that executives return a portion of their performance-based compensation in the event of a fi nancial restatement. The Commission has emphasized the importance of clawback policies by recommending that companies include in the CD&A disclosure regarding their policies and decisions with respect to the adjustment or recovery of awards or payments upon a fi nancial restatement or other similar adjustment. PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICIES COMPANIES THAT PUBLICLY 35 DISCLOSED THEY MAINTAIN A CLAWBACK POLICY 65 COMPANIES THAT HAVE NOT PUBLICLY DISCLOSED THEY MAINTAIN A CLAWBACK POLICY

Articles in this issue

view archives of Corporate Governance - 2007 Director & Executive Compensation Survey