Corporate Governance

2011 Director & Executive Compensation Survey

Issue link: https://digital.shearman.com/i/440363

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 65

2 | Title Here Shearman & Sterling LLP The results of our ninth Annual Survey of Selected Corporate Governance Practices of the Largest US Public Companies (the"Survey") reflect a year of transition in the compensation arena for the Top 100 Companies.* The adoption of mandatory say-on-pay pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") required many public companies (including 85 of the Top 100 Companies) to rethink how they present information regarding their compensation programs and processes to shareholders. Say-on-pay solidified the role of the proxy statement—particularly the CD&A—as the primary vehicle for the company to explain executive pay to investors. Many issuers, including a majority of the Top 100 Companies, refined their compensation disclosures to better explain the compensation process and effectively serve as a supporting statement for their say-on-pay votes. In particular, there was increased use of "executive summaries" in the CD&A (including at 76 of the Top 100 Companies) that: • Emphasized the pay-for-performance elements of the executive compensation program; • Highlighted key corporate and financial results; and • Noted corporate governance features and changes implemented in both 2010 and 2011. *See "Survey Methodology" on page 62 of this Survey for the list of the Top 100 Companies. Director & Executive Compensation Corporate Governance of the Largest US Public Companies 2011

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Corporate Governance - 2011 Director & Executive Compensation Survey